Volume 16, Issue 57 (4-2022)
MLJ 2022, 16(57): 1074-1053 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Saadatjo M, Ghasemzadeh Zawiyeh S M, Niknejad J. The Legitimacy of the Process of Human Cloning in the Light of the Opinions of Imamiyyah and Sunni Jurists. MLJ 2022; 16 (57) :1074-1053
URL: http://ijmedicallaw.ir/article-1-1561-en.html
URL: http://ijmedicallaw.ir/article-1-1561-en.html
1- Department of Private Law, Ayatollah Amoli Unit, Islamic Azad University, Mazandaran, Iran.
2- Private Law Department, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad Institute, Tehran, Iran.
3- Department of Private Law, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Private Law Department, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad Institute, Tehran, Iran.
3- Department of Private Law, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:
Background and Aim: The human cloning process is one of the important issues that have received special attention in the field of genetic engineering in recent years. The aim of the current research is to investigate the legitimacy of the mentioned process in the light of the opinions of Imamiyyah and Sunni jurists.
Method: This research is of theoretical type and the research method is descriptive-analytical and the method of data collection is library and has been done by referring to documents, books and articles.
Ethical Considerations: In order to organize this research, while observing the authenticity of the texts, honesty and fidelity have been observed.
Results: The findings of the present research show that, considering the various effects that the Cloning process creates in the society, it is necessary to issue a ruling on the permission of the mentioned process, both from a therapeutic and a reproductive perspective.
Conclusion: All kinds of Cloning processes, including therapeutic and reproductive research, are basically not considered creation and are considered a kind of laboratory industry and contrary to the claims of some religious people and the views of Sunni jurists and ethical scientists, no direct or indirect intervention in the imperative providence is considered obligatory, because creation is unique to giving existence to non-existence, which is specific to the essence of unity.
Please cite this article as:
Saadatjo M, Ghasemzadeh Zawiyeh SM, Niknejad J. The Legitimacy of the Process of Human Cloning in the Light of the Opinions of Imamiyyah and Sunni Jurists. Medical Law Journal. 2022; 16(57): e74.
Method: This research is of theoretical type and the research method is descriptive-analytical and the method of data collection is library and has been done by referring to documents, books and articles.
Ethical Considerations: In order to organize this research, while observing the authenticity of the texts, honesty and fidelity have been observed.
Results: The findings of the present research show that, considering the various effects that the Cloning process creates in the society, it is necessary to issue a ruling on the permission of the mentioned process, both from a therapeutic and a reproductive perspective.
Conclusion: All kinds of Cloning processes, including therapeutic and reproductive research, are basically not considered creation and are considered a kind of laboratory industry and contrary to the claims of some religious people and the views of Sunni jurists and ethical scientists, no direct or indirect intervention in the imperative providence is considered obligatory, because creation is unique to giving existence to non-existence, which is specific to the essence of unity.
Please cite this article as:
Saadatjo M, Ghasemzadeh Zawiyeh SM, Niknejad J. The Legitimacy of the Process of Human Cloning in the Light of the Opinions of Imamiyyah and Sunni Jurists. Medical Law Journal. 2022; 16(57): e74.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Received: 2022/10/11 | Accepted: 2023/01/2
Received: 2022/10/11 | Accepted: 2023/01/2
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
