Volume 16, Issue 57 (4-2022)
MLJ 2022, 16(57): 630-645 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nazari S, Mazloum Rahni A R, Nekounam V. A Comparative Study of Artificial Reproductive Rights in Iran and the United Kingdom. MLJ 2022; 16 (57) :630-645
URL: http://ijmedicallaw.ir/article-1-1514-en.html
URL: http://ijmedicallaw.ir/article-1-1514-en.html
1- Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, United Arab Emirates Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
2- Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Quds City Branch, Islamic Azad University, Quds City, Iran
3- Department of Jurisprudence and Law, Faculty of Law, Qom Branch, Hazrat Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran
2- Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Quds City Branch, Islamic Azad University, Quds City, Iran
3- Department of Jurisprudence and Law, Faculty of Law, Qom Branch, Hazrat Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran
Abstract:
Background and Aim: Artificial insemination as one of the new methods in medical science has caused major changes in childbearing methods. The present study seeks to investigate artificial reproductive rights in Iran and the United Kingdom.
Method: The present study is a comparative study using documentary and library methods.
Ethical Considerations: The writing of the present article has been done based on the exact principles of citation and the use of valid and relevant Persian and Latin sources.
Results: Acceptance of reproductive rights in jurisprudence and law is based on a jurisprudential attitude and most of the reasons for supporting it are adapting the changes of time to the evolution of the family institution, supporting population growth and trying to treat infertility problems. In Britain, liberal beliefs and welfare are the basis for all people, even children born of artificial insemination.
Conclusion: The UK legal system is a leading system in providing the highest benefits to a child born of fertility and custody, but taking on guardians by homosexuals, as well as commercializing artificial insemination, are disadvantages. In Iran, too, taking care of single people over the age of 30 can be a challenge for marriage.
Please cite this article as:
Nazari S, Mazloum Rahni AR, Nekounam V. A Comparative Study of Artificial Reproductive Rights in Iran and the United Kingdom. Medical Law Journal. 2022; 16(57): e47.
Method: The present study is a comparative study using documentary and library methods.
Ethical Considerations: The writing of the present article has been done based on the exact principles of citation and the use of valid and relevant Persian and Latin sources.
Results: Acceptance of reproductive rights in jurisprudence and law is based on a jurisprudential attitude and most of the reasons for supporting it are adapting the changes of time to the evolution of the family institution, supporting population growth and trying to treat infertility problems. In Britain, liberal beliefs and welfare are the basis for all people, even children born of artificial insemination.
Conclusion: The UK legal system is a leading system in providing the highest benefits to a child born of fertility and custody, but taking on guardians by homosexuals, as well as commercializing artificial insemination, are disadvantages. In Iran, too, taking care of single people over the age of 30 can be a challenge for marriage.
Please cite this article as:
Nazari S, Mazloum Rahni AR, Nekounam V. A Comparative Study of Artificial Reproductive Rights in Iran and the United Kingdom. Medical Law Journal. 2022; 16(57): e47.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Received: 2022/02/20 | Accepted: 2022/06/22
Received: 2022/02/20 | Accepted: 2022/06/22
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
